Relatives' Heartache Regarding Shoreline Degradation Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.
An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Past
One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.
“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Seeking Solutions and Clarity
The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”
It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”
The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.