🔗 Share this article

For months, threatening messages recurred. At first, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a retired army general, later from the police themselves. Finally, one resident states he was summoned to the local precinct and instructed bluntly: remain silent or encounter real trouble.

Shaikh is among those resisting a expensive project where this historic settlement – a massive informal community with rich history – is scheduled to be bulldozed and modernized by a multinational conglomerate.

"The culture of the slum is exceptional in the globe," explains the protester. "Yet their intention is to eradicate our way of life and prevent our protests."

Opposing Environments

The dank gullies of this community present a dramatic difference to the soaring skyscrapers and Bollywood penthouses that dominate the settlement. Homes are constructed informally and often missing basic amenities, small-scale operations produce dangerous fumes and the air is permeated by the overpowering odor of uncovered waste channels.

For certain residents, the prospect of Dharavi transformed into a glistening neighborhood of high-end towers, organized recreational areas, modern retail complexes and apartments with multiple bathrooms is a hopeful vision come true.

"We don't have sufficient health services, roads or sewage systems and we have no places for children to play," says a chai seller, 56, who moved from his home state in that period. "The only way is to demolish everything and build us new homes."

Local Protest

Yet certain residents, including Shaikh, are resisting the redevelopment.

All recognize that the slum, consistently overlooked as unauthorized settlement, is urgently needing investment and development. But they worry that this initiative – absent of resident participation – could potentially turn premium city property into an elite enclave, evicting the lower-caste, migrant communities who have lived there since the late 1800s.

This involved these excluded, migrant workers who built up the vacant wetlands into a widely studied marvel of local enterprise and commercial output, whose production is worth between $1m and $2m per year, making it a major unregulated sectors.

Displacement Concerns

Among approximately 1 million inhabitants living in the dense 220-hectare area, a minority will be able for replacement housing in the redevelopment, which is estimated to take seven years to accomplish. Others will be relocated to barren areas and saline fields on the remote edges of the metropolis, potentially divide a long-established social network. Some will be denied residences at all.

Those allowed to stay in the neighborhood will be allocated flats in high-rise buildings, a major break from the organic, shared lifestyle of residing and operating that has maintained Dharavi for generations.

Businesses from tailoring to clay work and recycling are projected to shrink in number and be moved to a designated "industrial sector" far from people's residences.

Livelihood Crisis

For residents like the leather artisan, a craftsman and multi-generational inhabitant to live in the slum, the plan presents a fundamental risk. His makeshift, multi-level facility makes leather coats – sharp blazers, suede trenches, decorated jackets – distributed in luxury boutiques in upscale neighborhoods and abroad.

Relatives dwells in the spaces downstairs and laborers and tailors – migrants from other states – reside on-site, permitting him to afford their labour. Away from Dharavi's enclave, housing costs are typically significantly costlier for basic accommodation.

Pressure and Coercion

Within the administrative buildings close by, an illustrated mock-up of the Dharavi project illustrates an alternative vision for the future. Fashionable residents mill about on cycles and eco-friendly transport, purchasing international baked goods and breakfast items and enlisting beverages on an outdoor area adjacent to a coffee shop and dessert parlor. This depicts a stark contrast from the affordable idli sambar morning meal and 5-rupee chai that maintains Dharavi's community.

"This is not improvement for us," says the protester. "It's an enormous property transaction that will render it impossible for us to survive."

Furthermore, there's skepticism of the business conglomerate. Run by a powerful tycoon – a leading figure and an associate of the national leader – the business group has encountered allegations of favoritism and financial impropriety, which it rejects.

Even as the state government labels it a partnership, the developer contributed $950m for its majority share. A case alleging that the redevelopment was questionably assigned to the corporation is under review in India's supreme court.

Ongoing Pressure

After they started to actively protest the redevelopment, local opponents assert they have been experienced ongoing efforts of pressure and threats – involving communications, clear intimidation and suggestions that speaking against the development was comparable with speaking against the country – by figures they assert work for the business conglomerate.

Among those suspected of making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c